2060 Laptop Vs 1660 Ti Laptop
Price now 1250$ Games supported 97% Cost now 682$ Games supported 96% Comparing of graphics carte du jour architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To get the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, merely for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile compatibility with other reckoner components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it'southward notebook size, connection slot and motorcoach, if the video menu is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared function of organization RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise merely for desktop reference ones (so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the bill of fare itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will show useful if you need some detail technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark functioning comparing. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you notice some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments department, we usually set problems quickly. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation nether various load, providing four split benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, ten, 11 and 12 (the terminal beingness done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX x criterion using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with ii scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, ane beingness few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abased temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark xi is now superseded by Time Spy. Criterion coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX xi characteristic level x criterion that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just similar Water ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% Benchmark coverage: fourteen% Burn down Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two split up tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery beast seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: fourteen% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete criterion, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to mensurate entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to brandish a battle between ii space fleets almost a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Dark Raid. Benchmark coverage: 8% This function of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for calculator games. Criterion coverage: 1% Permit's run across how expert the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large prepare of popular games across unlike resolutions: +xiii.8% −13.8% +vii.6% −seven.half-dozen% −6.seven% +6.vii% −7.ii% +7.two% −78.ix% +78.ix% +iii.2% −3.2% −7.3% +7.3% −24.1% +24.one% +3.4% −3.four% +4.8% −4.8% +6.five% −half dozen.v% +12% −12% +four.ix% −4.9% +4.3% −iv.three% +14.iii% −14.three% +1% −1% −iv.8% +4.8% −42.1% +42.1% +2.ii% −2.two% −vii.six% +vii.6% −sixteen.8% +sixteen.8% +half dozen.3% −vi.3% +3.1% −3.i% +three.7% −three.7% +9.8% −9.viii% +eleven% −11% +vii.8% −7.eight% −1.4% +1.4% −half dozen% +half dozen% +14.iii% −fourteen.3% +4.3% −four.3% −36.8% +36.8% +1.2% −1.2% −5.6% +five.6% −12.five% +12.5% +9.1% −ix.1% +xv.ii% −xv.ii% +6.8% −half dozen.8% +v.1% −5.1% +four.seven% −4.7% +16.7% −16.7% +11.5% −xi.5% +6.5% −6.5% +19% −19% +11.1% −11.ane% +18.8% −18.eight% +eight.7% −8.7% +52% −52% +five% −v% −57.ix% +57.nine% +11.8% −11.viii% +21.seven% −21.vii% +6.i% −6.one% +9.7% −ix.7% +8.vii% −8.7% +100% −100% +17.six% −17.six% +4.2% −iv.2% +11.four% −xi.iv% +13.6% −13.half dozen% +69.2% −69.2% +x.5% −x.5% +280% −280% +six.5% −6.5% +xviii.8% −18.8% +11.eight% −11.eight% +15.4% −xv.4% Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile since it shows better performance. Should yous yet accept questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments section, and nosotros shall answer. Do y'all recollect we are right or mistaken in our option? Vote by clicking "Like" push most your favorite graphics card. The nearest GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile'due south AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6700M, which is faster by v% and higher past 11 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile: The nearest GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile'due south AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6600M, which is faster by 3% and higher by 6 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to v: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to five: Here you can ask a question most this comparison, hold or disagree with our judgements, or study an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSRTX 2060 Mobile vs GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
Full general info
Place in performance rating 119 134 Value for money 11.23 24.12 Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Turing (2018−2021) GPU code proper name N18E-G1 TU106 N18E-G0 Market segment Laptop Laptop Release date six January 2019 (3 years agone) 23 Apr 2019 (3 years agone) Launch cost (MSRP) no information $229 Toll now $1250 $682 (3x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1920 1536 Cadre clock speed 960 MHz 1455 MHz Boost clock speed 1200 MHz 1590 MHz Number of transistors 10,800 1000000 6,600 million Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm Thermal design power (TDP) lxxx-90 Watt 80 Watt Texture make full rate 144.0 152.vi Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size large medium sized Interface PCIe three.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Retentiveness
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6 Maximum RAM corporeality 6 GB vi GB Memory bus width 192 Chip 192 Bit Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 12000 MHz Memory bandwidth 336.0 GB/due south 288.0 GB/s Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs Thousand-SYNC support + no data Technologies
API back up
DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) 12 (12_1) Shader Model six.v 6.five OpenGL 4.6 iv.6 OpenCL 1.two one.2 Vulkan 1.2.131 one.two.131 CUDA vii.v seven.v Criterion performance
Overall score
Gaming performance
Full HD 104 97 1440p 66 58 4K 41 35 Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 35−forty 86 Full Hard disk drive
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 91 80 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 71 66 Battleground 5 104 111 Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 97 104 Cyberpunk 2077 35−xl 68 Far Weep five 96 93 Far Cry New Dawn 82 88 Forza Horizon 4 108 134 Hitman iii 120 116 Horizon Zero Dawn 87 83 Carmine Dead Redemption ii 82 77 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 93 83 Sentry Dogs: Legion 86 82 Full Hard disk drive
High Preset
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 72 69 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 56 49 Battlefield 5 104 103 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 83 87 Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 54 Far Cry 5 91 89 Far Cry New Dawn 79 85 Forza Horizon 4 107 125 Hitman three 101 95 Horizon Zilch Dawn 67 65 Metro Exodus 56 54 Red Expressionless Redemption two 45 41 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 81 73 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111 103 Watch Dogs: Legion seventy 71 Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey l 53 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 48 42 Battleground 5 98 94 Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 52 Far Weep 5 84 83 Far Cry New Dawn 72 76 Forza Horizon 4 88 99 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60 55 Watch Dogs: Legion 38 33 1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 63 59 Hitman 3 62 59 Horizon Zero Dawn 45 43 Metro Exodus 35 30 Reddish Dead Redemption 2 29 26 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 49 46 The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 25 21 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 40 36 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38 32 Battlefield 5 75 69 Cyberpunk 2077 35−xl 25 Far Weep 5 63 60 Far Cry New Dawn 35−twoscore threescore Forza Horizon 4 35−forty 30−35 Watch Dogs: Legion 28 23 4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35 33 Hitman 3 34 31 Horizon Zero Dawn 25 23 Metro Exodus 35−twoscore 19 Red Dead Redemption 2 20 17 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25 24 The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 39 35 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25 22 Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 22 xiii Battlefield 5 42 38 Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 10 Far Cry 5 33 31 Far Cry New Dawn 35−40 32 Forza Horizon four 35−40 30−35 Watch Dogs: Legion 15 13 Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating 38.21 34.25 Novelty 6 January 2019 23 April 2019 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1920 1536 Retentivity bandwidth 336 288
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile by AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2060-mobile-vs-GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-mobile
0 Response to "2060 Laptop Vs 1660 Ti Laptop"
Post a Comment